Joe Stanek
1repmethods 主教练 · Austin Perkins 的教练
人物简介
Joe Stanek 是 1repmethods 的主教练,执教过包括 Austin Perkins 在内的世界冠军。本文中的 Austin 指 Austin Perkins。
依据 2026 年 10 月 26 日整理的书面访谈对照稿。下文保留完整中文问答,文末附完整英文问答。标题、小标题、人物简介、导读与编者注由编辑撰写;回答为受访者本人观点,中文译文尚未经受访者审阅。
01休息更充分,表现就会更好吗
问:执教 Austin 是否让你重新思考过一个此前深信不疑的训练观念?如果有,能否分享促使你改变看法的经历?
Joe Stanek:
肯定是“要休息得更充分才能表现好”这个观念。Austin 经常在最重的深蹲训练前仅48小时做过一节强度相当高的深蹲课之后,反而感觉蹲得更好。我注意到,每当他在两节主要训练之间安排一个轻训练日,之后就总觉得没劲,于是我把轻训练课和两节主要训练中强度较低的那节调换了位置。我认为这与他的身体杠杆条件有关,也就是说,他的身体比例让他在深蹲中更有优势。因此,他需要在一周中保持一种更“处于训练状态”的状态,才能在主要深蹲课中发挥好。
02连续几次低于预期,先看什么
问:当一名运动员连续几次训练的表现都低于预期时,你如何判断应该继续观察,还是调整计划?能否用一次实际的执教决策来说明?
Joe Stanek:
要了解健身房之外的变量。运动员表现不佳时,通常问题出在健身房之外的压力,而不是训练本身。在对训练进行重大调整之前,首先追踪并优化外部压力、营养和睡眠很重要。只有在运动员连续整整7天都把这些因素优化好、训练依然不理想的情况下,我才会选择调整。很难用一个具体例子来说明,不过你应该明白我的意思。
03不靠动作提示,怎样练出需要的动作特点
问:对于同一个动作,我们经常会看到不同、有时甚至看似矛盾的提示。面对身体比例、训练经历和既有动作习惯不同的运动员,你如何选择适合个人的提示?能否举例说明,你怎样判断一个提示确实带来了帮助,而不只是让动作看起来更接近某种技术模型?
Joe Stanek:
我通常根本不会选择给运动员动作提示。提示会降低力量输出,因为运动员往往会过多地思考提示,而不是直接完成动作。我认为,更好的方法是选择一种辅助动作或次要动作,练出你希望运动员具备的特点。例如,节奏卧推会迫使运动员更长时间地维持腿部驱动,所以面对难以持续腿驱的人,我会安排这个动作。反复练习之后,动作的其他部分往往会围绕这个变化自行组织起来。
04Austin 每周练几次,为什么增加一次卧推
问:从开始合作至今,Austin 的深蹲、卧推和硬拉频率是怎样变化的?他是一开始就能很好地适应和恢复于较高频率,还是逐渐适应了这种训练,抑或其他因素更重要?哪些观察让你形成了这样的判断?如果另一位运动员想尝试提高频率,你会先把他原有的每周训练量分散到更多天,还是采用不同的方法?
Joe Stanek:
变化并不大。我们一直每周深蹲3次、硬拉2次,这两种频率都算比较常见。不知为什么,人们似乎认为 Austin 的频率比这更高,但实际上并不是。唯一发生变化的是卧推,从每周4次增加到了5次。
从一开始,我就给 Austin 安排了每周3次深蹲,原因就是前面说的:他的身体条件非常适合深蹲,因此需要更多总训练工作量,才能在深蹲时感觉有力。
现在每周硬拉2次相当常见,这只是让运动员有更多练习机会。
我把卧推改成每周5次,是因为 Austin 在每周4次时就是觉得练得不够。其中两节课之间的休息时间太长,他几乎会因此出现去训练化。那些课练得不好,后续训练也会跟着受影响。所以我们增加了第5节课来填补这个间隔,在这个不再休息的日子练习最能让他感觉有力的特点。对于 Austin,这意味着安排一节强度相当高、但动作本身会限制可用重量的训练,具体就是长暂停卧推和窄握 Larsen 卧推。他可以把这两种动作练到很接近力竭,同时仍恢复得很好,因为实际能使用的重量被限制得很低。我们的微周期大致如下:
第1训练日:主要卧推第2训练日:高次数卧推第3训练日:填补间隔的训练第4训练日:次要卧推第5训练日:第二节高次数卧推
相较于完全休息,填补间隔是增加一节训练课的唯一理由。
如果你的问题指的是极高频率训练(每周深蹲4次以上、硬拉3次以上、卧推6或7次),我的答案是:不应该这样做。你会受伤。除非你是像 Agata Sitko 那样的职业力量举运动员,她是世界上唯一成功执行过这种计划的运动员,否则连尝试这种训练的念头都不要有。如果力量举对你而言只是一项爱好,这种安排就无法持续。正常训练会让你取得更好的进步。
我必须礼貌地拒绝说明如何制定这样的计划,因为我不能违背良心,让你的读者以为这是一个好主意。它并不是。
谢谢。愿你的重量都轻松,判罚灯都亮白灯。
编者注
原答列出了五个卧推训练日,但没有给出休息日的位置,不能据此读成连续五天训练。提问讨论提高训练频率,Joe 在后半段进一步谈到并反对他所说的“极高频率”。
完整英文问答
Question 1
Has coaching Austin led you to reconsider a training belief you previously felt strongly about? If so, could you share the experience that prompted you to rethink it?
Answer
Definitely that you need to be more “rested” to perform. Austin’s squat often feels better after a quite intense session of squats just 48 hours before his heaviest session. I noticed this trend when he would always feel weak after taking a light day between his two main sessions, so I swapped the light session and the less intense of his two main sessions. I believe this is because of how his body is leveraged- that is to say his proportions allow him a greater advantage in the squat. Because of this he needs a more “trained” state through the week to succeed in his primary squat session.
Question 2
When a lifter performs below expectations for several sessions in a row, what helps you decide whether to keep observing or adjust the program? Could you illustrate this with an actual coaching decision?
Answer
Understanding the variables outside the gym. Often if a lifter is underperforming, it’s usually a matter of stresses outside the gym, not inside. It’s important to track & optimize external stress, nutrition & sleep first before making any major training changes. Only if a lifter can go a full 7 days having those all optimized for and still have bad training would I choose to make a change. It’s a little hard to illustrate specifically, but you get the idea.
Question 3
We often see different, sometimes seemingly contradictory, cues for the same lift. With lifters who differ in body proportions, training experience and established movement habits, how do you choose a cue that suits the individual? Could you give an example of how you judged that a cue genuinely helped, rather than simply making the lift look closer to a particular technical model?
Answer
I usually don’t choose to cue lifters at all. Cues lower force output because a lifter often thinks too much about the cue rather than just simply executing the lift. I think it is better to choose an accessory or secondary lift that trains the quality you’re looking for in the lifter. For example, tempo bench forces lifters to hold their leg drive longer, so I’ll implement it for someone struggling to maintain their leg drive. Once done repeatedly, the rest of the lift tends to self organize around that change.
Question 4
How has Austin’s squat, bench and deadlift frequency evolved since you began working together? Did he respond and recover well from higher frequency from the outset, adapt to it over time, or were other factors more important? What observations informed your view? For another lifter interested in trying higher frequency, would you start by spreading their existing weekly training volume across more days, or take a different approach?
Answer
It hasn’t changed much. We’ve always squatted 3x per week and deadlifted 2x per week, both of which are semi common. People seem to believe that Austin uses higher frequencies than this for some reason. He does not. Bench would be the only thing that’s changed, and that’s gone from 4x per week to 5x per week.
I’ve given Austin 3 squat sessions per week from the start for the reasons I’ve talked about previously- he’s shaped very well to perform the squat, so he needs more total work to get the squat to feel strong.
Deadlift being 2x per week is fairly standard these days as it just gives the lifter more practice.
Benching 5x a week was a change I made because Austin simply felt undertrained on 4x. 2 of those 4 sessions had too much time off between the sessions and he would almost detrain as a result. When those sessions weren’t productive so would the sessions that would follow them. So we added a 5th session to bridge the gap- training the quality that makes him feel the strongest on that non rest day. In Austin’s case, that means a rather intense session of an exercise that limits the weight he can use, in this case long pause bench & close grip Larsen press. He can train both of these to high proximity to failure while still recovering well because the actual loads he can use are so limited, Our micro cycle looks a bit like this:
Primary Bench Day 1 High Rep Bench Day 2 Bridge the Gap Session Day 3 Secondary Bench Day 4 High Rep Bench 2 Day 5
Bridging the gap is the only reason to ever add a session in vs pure rest.
If in your question you’re referring to doing ultra high frequency training (4+ squats, 3+ deads, 6 or 7 benches)- the answer is you shouldn’t. You will get hurt. Unless you are somehow a professional powerlifting athlete like Agata Sitko, the ONLY lifter in the world that has ever run a program like that successfully, don’t even begin to think about trying something like that. You cannot sustain it if powerlifting is only a hobby for you. You will make better gains by training normally.
I must kindly refuse to illustrate how you would create such a program, as I cannot in good conscience allow your readers to think it is a good idea. It is not.
Thank you. May all your weights be light & your lights be white.
继续了解 Joe
Joe 在回信中邀请读者到 Instagram @1repmethods 阅读更多训练想法。
他在访谈后提到的教练服务
Joe 表示,愿意考虑与读过访谈、希望接受指导的读者合作,并提出首月免费。他随后补充:至少承诺参加三个月,只接受最先回复的五人;常规月费为 220 美元,另加 6.25% 销售税。
三个月是否包含免费首月、截止时间及取消或退款条款尚未说明。现时是否仍有名额,也需要向他确认。有意了解可发邮件至 joe@1repmethods.com,主题写“Interview Response”。这是 Joe 提供的信息,是否合作由双方确认。
相关邮件原文与中文对照
PS, do please remember to inform your readers that my Instagram is available for them to view for more thoughts on training. @1repmethods
Sure, if you’d like, you can tell anyone who reads the questions and is interested in working with me for coaching that I’d be happy to consider working with them & that I’d be willing to give the first month free. Just tell them to email me with the subject line “Interview Response”
There would need to be at least a 3 month commitment, and I’ll only take the first 5 who respond. My usual monthly price is $220 USD + sales tax of 6.25%.
补充:请记得告诉读者,他们可以到我的 Instagram 查看更多训练想法。@1repmethods
可以。如果你愿意,可以告诉读过这些问答、并且有兴趣接受我指导的人,我很乐意考虑与他们合作,也愿意提供首月免费。请让他们发邮件时使用“Interview Response”作为主题。
需要至少承诺参加3个月,而且我只接受最先回复的5个人。我通常每月收费220美元,另加6.25%的销售税。